The cholera outbreak causing grief in Nigeria

Yahanasu Rabilu Lawal has been grieving for her seven-year-old son Isma’il, in her one-bedroom house on the outskirts of the Nigerian capital, Abuja.

He died of cholera three weeks ago.

Mrs Lawal and her husband, a farmer, tried unsuccessfully to manage the disease at home, as they couldn’t afford to take her to hospital.

She says her son “continued to vomit profusely, through the mouth and through the nose. I then tapped him, calling him. But he didn’t respond. He was no more.”

He is among the 2,000 people who have died from cholera since the start of the year.

Nearly 60,000 people have been infected with the disease, according to the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control.

As the world grapples with the Covid pandemic, Nigeria is struggling to deal with the deadly outbreak of cholera.

The nationwide outbreak has been reported in at least 24 of Nigeria’s 36 states – including the capital.

Nigeria is a cholera-endemic country, according to experts, with outbreaks occurring almost every year especially during the rainy season. But this year’s outbreak is seen as particularly worrisome.

Cholera is one of the deadliest water-borne diseases. People catch it by drinking contaminated water and because of poor sanitation and hygiene.

The UN Children’s agency Unicef says only about a quarter of Nigeria’s population use improved sources of drinking water and sanitation facilities. It is also being made worse by people relieving themselves in the open.

Nigerian health authorities have been trying to control the spread by sending medical teams to the states as well as by treating water sources.

But experts say the authorities and the public must prioritise basic hygiene, sanitation and access to safe drinking water as long term solutions.

Article share tools

……………………………………………………

Democrats Vow To Protect Abortion Rights. The Question Is How.

They control all of government, but the Senate filibuster could stop them from taking any major action.

President Joe Biden and congressional Democrats swiftly condemned Texas Republicans this week for a newly enacted state law that bans abortions after six weeks and even awards money to people who report on someone assisting another person terminating a pregnancy.

Democrats have made it clear they don’t support the policy or the Supreme Court’s decision to let the law stand while challenges move through the courts. Now they have to decide whether to actually do something about it.

There are a few options, none of them easy. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced Thursday that Democrats will vote on the Women’s Health Protection Act, a bill that would enshrine abortion rights into federal law. Democrats could also attempt to expand the Supreme Court to ensure it’s less skewed toward conservatives.

But neither of those efforts can pass the Senate, given its 50-50 split and the 60-vote margin needed to bypass a filibuster.

Democrats could try to get rid of the filibuster altogether ― which progressives are already pushing for to pass voting rights legislation ― but they currently don’t have the votes to do it.

“I support ending the filibuster. I support codifying Roe v. Wade. I would support reforming the Supreme Court,” Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) told HuffPost. “But we need to be real. There are not votes in the U.S. Senate to do any of those things.”

Democrats also have the option of sitting back and allowing abortion rights to be decimated while they control the White House, House of Representatives and the Senate ― something that many voters would see as a betrayal.

“It’s going to be a real problem,” particularly for new voters who supported Democrats in 2020, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told HuffPost. “They gave us the House, the White House and the Senate, and they want to see us deliver. And if we don’t deliver on real, substantive change, we’re going to lose them again.”

Biden vowed to take action to fight Republicans’ assault on abortion rights, including through legislation, though he did not address calls to end the filibuster or reform the courts.

In a statement on Thursday, he directed the Gender Policy Council and the Office of the White House Counsel “to launch a whole-of-government effort to respond to this decision.”

That will include investigating what the departments of Justice and Health and Human Services can do to ensure that women in Texas can access abortions, and taking a closer look at “what legal tools we have to insulate women and providers from the impact of Texas’ bizarre scheme of outsourced enforcement to private parties,” according to the statement.

OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES

Democrats have condemned the Texas abortion law. Now they need to decide how to combat it. 

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Wednesday that Biden would also “continue to call for the codification of Roe,” noting that both Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris spoke about the need for such legislation during the campaign. “This highlights even further the need to move forward on that effort,” Psaki said at a press briefing.

Psaki said she could not comment on Biden’s stance on the Women’s Health Protection Act, though, without looking into the particulars of the bill.

The House is currently in recess through Sept. 20. The Senate is back on Sept. 13. Democrats’ legislative agenda is already packed, but Pelosi vowed Thursday to add in the abortion rights measure to combat Texas’ abortion law, S.B. 8.

“SB8 is the most extreme, dangerous abortion ban in half a century, and its purpose is to destroy Roe v. Wade, and even refuses to make exceptions for cases of rape and incest,” she said in a statement. “This ban necessitates codifying Roe v. Wade.”

The bill likely has the votes to pass the House, but Democrats’ control of the Senate is very narrow: They hold only 50 votes, plus Harris’ additional tiebreaking vote. Under current filibuster rules, most legislation requires 60 votes ― which is why some Democrats are pushing to amend those rules to get abortion protections passed.

“We must pass federal laws to protect the right to safe, legal abortion,” Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) tweeted on Thursday. “We must pass the Women’s Health Protection Act to put an end to these cruel state bans on our rights. And we can’t let the filibuster stand in our way.”

Jayapal said Biden should do more to push for filibuster reform.

“This is just another example of why we have to make a very difficult choice to actually restore democracy to the Senate and to reform or eliminate the filibuster,” Jayapal said. “We’ve been making the case for eliminating the filibuster, but I think the urgency of it has gone up.”

A spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) did not respond to a request for comment on how he plans to proceed.

Other Democrats want to go even further by enacting major court reform. This legislation would also likely be blocked by the filibuster, though.

“This Supreme Court abortion ruling cannot be the last word,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), who has introduced legislation to add four justices to the Supreme Court. “Senate Democrats have the power to fix this problem right now by abolishing the filibuster and passing my legislation to expand the Supreme Court.”

“Democrats can either abolish the filibuster and expand the court, or do nothing as millions of peoples’ bodies, rights, and lives are sacrificed for far-right minority rule,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) tweeted early Thursday. “This shouldn’t be a difficult decision.”

SERGIO FLORES VIA GETTY IMAGES

People protest S.B. 8 at the state Capitol on May 29, 2021, in Austin, Texas. 

There are other legislative options, too. Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, proposed repealing the Hyde Amendment, a decades-old legislative provision that bans the use of federal funds to pay for abortion except in cases of rape, incest or saving the life of the mother.

“The House voted to do so by voting to pass our package of spending bills in July,” she told HuffPost in a statement. “The Senate must do the same.”

Maloney also called for lifting restrictions on medication abortion, or the use of medicine to terminate a pregnancy. She and other Democrats recently introduced a resolution calling on the Food and Drug Administration to lift its restrictions on one abortion drug, mifepristone.

“Medication abortion is a very safe, common way to access abortion care ― in fact, nearly half of all abortions in the U.S. are medication abortion,” she said. “The FDA needs to act now to provide this safe and simple way for people to have their abortions at home.”

For the moment, Democrats can rail against the Texas law all they want, but all eyes will be on what they do about it. For Smith, a Democratic senator working with a Democrat-led Senate, House and White House, the most effective solution is to channel that outrage into winning more Democratic seats in the 2022 elections. The votes simply aren’t there, she said, to nix the filibuster.

“It is stunning to me that a rule of the U.S. Senate with a racist past is the thing that is stopping us from protecting women when they need us to protect them,” Smith said. “I am deeply frustrated as a U.S. senator. … The only thing that I know to do is go out there and organize, organize, organize and win elections.”

The senator emphasized that the Supreme Court separated itself “from a vast majority of voters,” even in Texas, by letting the state’s extreme anti-abortion law take effect. That lends itself to Democrats fighting back at the polls.

“I do believe this is a galvanizing moment,” she said.

Regardless of whether Democrats take legislative action in near term, their party is certain to make abortion a campaign issue moving forward. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee issued a statement saying “freedom for women to make our own health care decisions is on the ballot in 2022.”

“This attack on women’s health care is a powerful reminder of the stakes in next year’s election — and why we must defend a Democratic Senate majority with the power to confirm or reject Supreme Court justices,” DSCC spokesperson Jazmin Vargas said in a statement.

……………………………………………………

Hypocrisy driving some MPs’ opposition to Dual Citizenship Amendment Bill – NPPUSA Chair

The Chairwoman of the USA branch of the ruling New Patriotic Party, Obaa Yaa Frimpong has bluntly called out Members of Parliament whose opposing stance on the newly-gazetted Dual Citizenship Amendment Bill have nothing to do with the allegiance of dual citizens.

According to the “Iron Lady”, These MPs are so wrapped up in preserving their own personal interest in perpetual occupancy of Parliamentary seats that they have no care that the children that their wives are sent to United States and other developed countries to bear for citizenships would one day be excluded from political participation in Ghana due to their stance on the Bill.

The NPPUSA boss went as far as to call into question the patriotism of these MPs because, knowing what the Ghanaian diaspora has proven over the years as to what impactful difference they are capable of making, denying them participation at certain levels solely for reasons of self Preservation, amounts to sacrificing the nation’s interest for their own.

“I don’t think these are people who love Ghana as they claim to love Ghana,” Obaa Yaa continued. “Because if you love Ghana, and you want the best for Ghana, and you want the long term prosperity of Ghana, there’s no way you’re going to be exclusive” of Ghanaians who have proven themselves beyond any reasonable doubt of their allegiance and their contributions to nation building.

“These people want to make being in Parliament some kind of a profession for as long as they can be there and shut the door on everybody,” Obaa Yaa said.

To the claim that some MPs push that “Ghanaians don’t want people with dual allegiance at certain positions, the NPPUSA Chair said it was not true.

Obaa Yaa pointed out that her experience in some rural parts of the Northern Region where her organization is working with village women tells her that the rank and file in Ghana does not care what passport one holds so long as one can help them out of their poverty.

“Some of these women don’t even know what a dual citizen is, but they welcome them into their communities and work with them to change their lives.

The opposition to the Dual Citizenship Amendment Bill is currently going through the Parliamentary process and needs two-thirds of ‘Yay” votes and subsequent presidential assent to become law. Proponents of the Bill have made it clear that it is a non-partisan Bill and thus are lobbying MPs of both sides of the isle to support it.

The full interview airs on DNT’s Diaspora Weekly on Saturday September 4 at 9am.

DNT News, Accra

……………………………………………