Translate

Saturday 22 May 2021

Bayer Foundation Social Impact Startup Academy 2021 for Startups in Sub-Saharan Africa.




Application Deadline: May 31st 2021

Together with Bayer Foundation, Get in the Ring is looking for impact-driven startups from all of Sub Saharan Africa to join their Social Impact Startup Academy. The goal of the Social Impact Startup Academy (SISTAC) is to help Sub Saharan African companies to grow their business with input and workshops with Social Innovation Masters students from WFI – Ingolstadt School of Management in Germany!

Requirements

Must be founded and operate in Sub Saharan Africa
Business must have a major focus on Sustainable Development Goals as a whole, with extra emphasis on SDG 2 and 3
Preference towards Female founder/co-founder companies
Past the idea stage of development (ie must have existing customers)
Must be a for profit entity

Benefits

Access to mentors from the Ingolstadt School of Management
Access to Bayer Foundation network
Business consultation free of charge
Access to funding possibilities and competitions
Access to SISTAC knowledge database
Access to workshops and events

Start of Voting - Fair Trade Africa

Dear Sofonie Dala,

Congratulations! After careful review of the entries into the Recover Africa Youth Competition, the judging panel has selected you as one of the 16 finalists of the competition down from over 500 submissions of interest. Your entry was selected by a judging panel consisting of judges who are part of our network. We were impressed by your idea and presentation and believe strongly in your potential for continued success.

The next phase of this competition is an online public voting process. 

Vote for Sofonie Dala here:

https://fairtraderecover.africa/voting?country=Angola&category=Gender&name=&votes=

Please encourage your friends, family and colleagues to vote for her by visiting the link - and clicking Vote button below her video.

Country: Angola

Name: Sofonie Dala




After it will require you to login with your Facebook or Gmail account.


The Book Of Daniel - Bible Story Full Movie


 

Israel and Hamas agree ceasefire

 The Israeli security cabinet has approved a unilateral ceasefire to end a military operation in the Gaza Strip after 11 days of fighting, Israeli media have reported.


Hamas has confirmed that a “mutual and simultaneous” truce with Israel would begin at 2am on Friday.

DNT News

………………………………………………………………


Martin Bashir’s Diana interview: All the key findings from inquiry into landmark BBC Panorama scoop

 The new inquiry concluded Martin Bashir mocked up fake bank statements and showed them to Earl Spencer to gain access to Diana.

Martin Bashir’s Diana interview: All the key findings from inquiry into landmark BBC Panorama scoop



Martin Bashir used “deceitful behaviour” to secure his landmark Panorama interview with Princess Diana in 1995, an official inquiry has found.


The report by Lord Dyson concluded the journalist breached BBC rules by mocking up fake bank statements and showing them to Diana‘s brother, Earl Spencer, to gain access to the princess.

And the inquiry also said the corporation covered up Mr Bashir’s behaviour and it “fell short of high standards of integrity and transparency”.

The BBC and Mr Bashir have both apologised, and the corporation has written apologies to Diana’s sons Prince William and Prince Harry, as well as Prince Charles and Earl Spencer.

What did Diana’s brother allege?

Earl Spencer claimed that in the weeks before the programme, Mr Bashir showed him forged bank statements that related to alleged payments made to his sister’s former private secretary Patrick Jephson and another former royal household member by the security services.

The documents falsely suggested the individuals were being paid for keeping the princess under surveillance.

Mr Bashir also showed him mocked-up documents, relating to a former employee of the earl, that Mr Bashir also used as he tried to gain access to the princess.

What are the main findings of the 127-page report?

• Mr Bashir commissioned fake bank statements from graphic designer Matt Wiessler, purportedly showing payments by Penfolds Consultants and News International into the bank account of Alan Waller, a former employee of Earl Spencer

• Mr Bashir showed the documents to Earl Spencer on a date early in September 1995. The report said Mr Wiessler is an entirely reputable graphic designer who did freelance work for the BBC. Nobody has criticised him for accepting the commission

• A few days later, probably on 14 September, Mr Bashir also produced to Earl Spencer other bank statements which, he said, showed payments into the account of Mr Jephson and Richard Aylard (the Prince of Wales‘ former private secretary)

• The report said it is likely that these statements were created by Mr Bashir and contained information he had fabricated

• By showing Earl Spencer the fake Waller and Jephson/Aylard statements and informing him of their contents, Mr Bashir deceived and induced him to arrange a meeting with Princess Diana. By gaining access to Princess Diana in this way, Mr Bashir was able to persuade her to agree to give the interview

• The inquiry found this behaviour was in serious breach of the 1993 edition of the BBC’s producer guidelines on straight dealing

Earl Spencer stands outside Althorp, the family Home near Northampton
Image:Diana’s brother, Earl Spencer

• The BBC “fell short of the high standards of integrity and transparency which are its hallmark” in the subsequent investigation

• A 1996 investigation conducted by Lord Hall, who was director of BBC news and current affairs when the Diana interview was screened, and Anne Sloman was woefully ineffective, the report found

• It said the 1996 investigation did not achieve its purpose of getting to the bottom of what Mr Bashir had done or why he had done it

• In particular, it did not address the specific question of whether, by showing the fake statements to Earl Spencer, Mr Bashir was able to secure an introduction to Princess Diana and thereby an interview. That was a crucial omission

• The new inquiry said Lord Hall and Mrs Sloman failed to interview Earl Spencer, which “was a big mistake”

• They did not scrutinise Mr Bashir’s account with the necessary degree of scepticism and caution: they knew he had lied three times when he said that he had not shown the fake statements to Earl Spencer (these were serious lies for which he gave no explanation)

‘Diana didn’t know who to trust’

• They knew that he had been unable to provide any credible explanation of why he had commissioned the fake statements (which was a serious breach of the BBC’s producers’ guidelines on straight dealing); and they knew that Mr Bashir’s account of what happened was largely uncorroborated

• And without knowing Earl Spencer’s version of the facts; without receiving from Mr Bashir a credible explanation of what he had done and why he had done it; and in the light of his serious and unexplained lies, Lord Hall could not reasonably have concluded, as he did, that Mr Bashir was an honest and honourable man

• The BBC without justification “fell short of the high standards of integrity and transparency which are its hallmark by covering up in its press logs such facts as it had been able to establish about how Mr Bashir secured the interview and failing to mention Mr Bashir’s activities or the BBC investigations of them on any news programme”

Princess Diana during her interview with Martin Bashir for the BBC and a letter she wrote after it was broadcast
Image:Princess Diana wrote a letter over a month after the programme was broadcast, saying she had ‘no regrets’ about the interview

It comes as a letter which Diana wrote over a month after the programme aired has been published by the inquiry for the first time.

In the note, she defended her decision to be interviewed by Mr Bashir and she had “no regrets”.

The letter, dated 22 December 1995, said: “Martin Bashir did not show me any documents, nor give me any information that I was not previously aware of.

“I consented to the interview on Panorama without any undue pressure and have no regrets concerning the matter.”

The note was written after Mr Bashir was asked by BBC executives to provide evidence Diana had not been shown fake bank statements as he tried to gain access to her.

Lord Dyson’s report said: “Mr Bashir gave them an account of the faking of the documents. Crucially, he told them that he had not shown them to anyone.

“They accepted that he was telling them the truth, but asked him to provide independent evidence that Princess Diana had not been shown the documents.

“Within a few hours, Mr Bashir obtained a note dated 22 December 1995, signed by her which supported what he had said. I am satisfied that the Diana note is a genuine document.”

Earl Spencer has told a new Panorama programme: “I have seen the content of the letter. It does not exonerate the BBC as far as I’m concerned because Diana is dealing from a position from having been lied to. She didn’t know that the whole obtaining of the interview was based on a series of falsehoods that led to her being vulnerable to this.”

Martin Bashir with the BAFTA award he won for best talk show after the Panorama interview with Diana
Image:Martin Bashir has apologised, saying the faking of bank statements was ‘an action I deeply regret’

Martin Bashir’s reaction to the report

In response to Lord Dyson’s findings, Mr Bashir apologised, saying the faking of bank statements was “a stupid thing to do and was an action I deeply regret”.

But he added he felt it had “no bearing whatsoever on the personal choice by Princess Diana to take part in the interview”.

Earl Spencer’s reaction

He tweeted: “I’d like to thank the TV journalist Andy Webb for his tireless professionalism in bringing the Bashir-Panorama-BBC scandal to light. If he hadn’t have pursued this story for well over a decade, and shared his findings with me last October, today’s findings wouldn’t have surfaced.”

The earl has told Panorama: “Well, the irony is that I met Martin Bashir on 31 August 1995 because exactly two years later she died and I do draw a line between the two events.

It’s quite clear from the introduction that I sat in on on the 19 September 1995… that everyone was going to be made untrustworthy, and I think that Diana did lose trust in really key people.

“This is a young girl in her mid 30s who has lived this extraordinarily turbulent, difficult time in the public eye. She didn’t know who to trust.… in the end, when she died two years later, she was without any form of real protection.”

Tony Hall
Image:Former director-general Lord Hall has apologised that the 1996 inquiry ‘fell well short of what was required’

Lord Hall’s reaction

Former director-general Lord Hall has apologised that the 1996 inquiry “fell well short of what was required”.

He said: “I have read Lord Dyson’s report, and I accept that our investigation 25 years ago into how Panorama secured the interview with Princess Diana fell well short of what was required.

“In hindsight, there were further steps we could and should have taken following complaints about Martin Bashir’s conduct.”

He added: “I was wrong to give Martin Bashir the benefit of the doubt, basing that judgment as I did on what appeared to be deep remorse on his part.”

Director-general Tim Davie delivered the news to staff
Image:Current director-general Tim Davie has apologised on behalf of the BBC

The BBC’s reaction

The corporation’s director-general, Tim Davie, says the BBC offers a “full and unconditional apology”.

He said: “While today’s BBC has significantly better processes and procedures, those that existed at the time should have prevented the interview being secured in this way. The BBC should have made greater effort to get to the bottom of what happened at the time and been more transparent about what it knew.

“While the BBC cannot turn back the clock after a quarter of a century, we can make a full and unconditional apology. The BBC offers that today.”

Matt Wiessler’s reaction

Mr Wiessler’s solicitor, Louis Charalambous of Simons Muirhead Burton, said: “The report makes absolutely clear that Mr Wiessler acted responsibly and appropriately throughout. He is an honourable and thoroughly professional individual who won awards during his time at the BBC.

“Lord Dyson’s findings are a welcome relief to him. He is still waiting for a personal apology from the director general.”

Patrick Jephson’s reaction

He said: “After so many years it is a relief to know more of the truth behind events which had so many unhappy and even tragic consequences.

“I am grateful to Lord Spencer, Lord Dyson and the tenacious journalists who brought the story to light. I also acknowledge the BBC’s full apology which I received from the director general this afternoon.”

He told a new Panorama programme that after the 1995 interview, she was “cast adrift” from the “royal support structure that had guided and safeguarded her for so many years”.

He suggested this “inevitably made her vulnerable to people who were unable properly to look after her”.

Lord Birt’s reaction

Lord Birt, director-general of the BBC at the time of the interview, said: “We now know that the BBC harboured a rogue reporter on Panorama who fabricated an elaborate, detailed but wholly false account of his dealings with Earl Spencer and Princess Diana.

“This is a shocking blot on the BBC’s enduring commitment to honest journalism; and it is a matter of the greatest regret that it has taken 25 years for the full truth to emerge.

“As the director-general at the time, I offer my deep apologies to Earl Spencer and to all others affected.”

In March this year, the Metropolitan Police said Mr Bashir will not face a criminal investigation over documents related to the landmark Diana interview.

………………………………………………………………

Arctic nations agree to fight global warming despite tensions

 Latest data shows the Arctic is warming three times faster than anywhere else on the planet, putting summer ice at risk.

Arctic nations agree to fight global warming despite tensions


Arctic countries have pledged to fight global warming, which is happening three times faster in the northern reaches of the earth than elsewhere and to preserve peace in the region as its geopolitical importance increases.


Accelerated global warming, untapped resources, new maritime routes opened up by retreating sea ice, and the future of local populations all topped the agenda as foreign ministers of countries bordering the Arctic gathered in Reykjavik in Iceland on Thursday.

“We are committed to advancing a peaceful Arctic region where cooperation prevails on climate, the environment, science and safety,” US Secretary of State Antony Blinken told his Arctic Council counterparts from Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia and Sweden.

“The Arctic as a region for strategic competition has seized the world’s attention” but ‘rule of law’ must be ensured so that it remains a region free of conflict where countries act responsibly,” he added.

Military manoeuvres

The warming climate has opened up the Arctic for shipping, fishing, drilling and mining, and China, an observer to the Council, has made no secret of its interest in the vast territory rich in natural resources and where retreating sea ice has opened up new maritime routes.

Meanwhile, Russia has beefed up its military presence in the Arctic – reopening and modernising bases abandoned since the Soviet Union collapsed – and the United States has stepped up naval exercises.

“It is important to extend the positive relations that we have within the Arctic Council to encompass the military sphere as well,” Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told the participants at the meeting.

A Russian serviceman stands guard by a military truck on the island of Alexandra Land, which is part of the Franz Josef Land archipelago [Maxime Popov/AFP]

“We have highlighted at the meeting that we see no grounds for conflict here. Even more so for any development of military programmes of some blocks here,” Lavrov told reporters.The Russian envoy also said his country supported the idea of hosting a summit of Arctic nations during its two-year presidency of the Council.

Lavrov has also called for a resumption of regular meetings between the chiefs of staff of the Council’s member countries.

Annual meetings between armed forces chiefs from Arctic states were halted in 2014 following Russia’s annexation of Crimea. Russia has not participated in another forum, the Arctic Security Forces Roundtable, since 2014.

The Arctic Council was set up 25 years ago to deal with issues such as the environment and areas of international cooperation, and its mandate explicitly excludes military security.

Climate change

Discussions focused heavily on the effect of global heating on the once-icy region.

“The climate crisis is our most serious long-term threat with the Arctic warming three times faster than anywhere else on the planet,” Canadian Foreign Minister Marc Garneau told the Council.

The alarming data was part of a report published on Thursday by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), which also warned of an increased risk of the region’s sea ice disappearing completely in summer, before solidifying in winter.

“We have a duty to strengthen our cooperation for the benefit of the people inhabiting the Arctic,” Danish Foreign Minister Jeppe Kofod said.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken (right) with Greenlandic Premier Mute Egede and Mie Wingding, a scientist at the Greenlands Climate Research Centre, visits the Black Ridge Viewing site in Kangerlussuaq, Greenland [Saul Loeb/Pool via Reuters]

At the previous Council meeting in 2019 in Finland, the Trump administration blocked the signing of a joint declaration for the first time since the Council was established in 1996, as it refused to include climate change in the final statement.The adoption of a joint statement on Thursday went without a hitch, as did the agreement of a 10-year strategic plan for the first time in the Council’s history.

In addition to the countries bordering the Arctic, the Council also includes six organisations representing the Indigenous peoples of the region and 13 observer countries.

Blinken ended his four-day tour, which started in Denmark, by visiting Greenland directly, where he told reporters that the US wished to make their partnership with Greenland – a Danish territory – “even stronger” and that he could “confirm” the US was no longer attempting to buy it.

SOURCE: NEWS AGENCIES

………………………………………………………………

We just have 1 week of TFF Challenge to go (deadline is the 28th of May)


 

The TFF Challenge 2021 is in full swing – only 7 days until the pitch deadline of May 28th!


There has never been a more exciting or important time to join the Thought For Food movement. Help us spread the word to anyone you know who has a startup, an idea, or an interest in building innovative solutions! The TFF Challenge is the place to be.


 The TFF Challenge is the world’s largest and most diverse agri-food-tech innovation challenge open to purpose-driven innovators at all stages (ideation through to an incorporated startup). This is our call to action to seek all kinds of solutions to address the prevailing question: 

“How do we feed 10bn people on a hotter planet?”


To kick off the TFF Challenge 2021, we will run a 48-hour virtual global hackathon called the “BrainRave”. The event will unite you, our community, and other creative change-makers to connect, learn, collaborate, and develop real ideas and solutions for improved food systems and climate action: entrepreneurs, designers, coders, investors, media, artists, activists, and more. You will co-create deep insights and creative solutions leading up to the UN Food Systems Summit and COP-26: “how to feed 10bn people on a hotter planet?”


Website: https://thoughtforfood.org/challenge/




International Day of Clean Energy 2024 | 26 January 2024

 Every dollar of investment in renewables creates three times more jobs than in the fossil fuel industry.  Greetings friends. I am Sofonie D...