Translate

Wednesday, 1 September 2021

‘Stop being selfish’: Africans decry ‘vaccine apartheid’

 In Africa, less than 2 percent of its 1.3 billion people are fully vaccinated against COVID-19.

‘Stop being selfish’: Africans decry ‘vaccine apartheid’


A prominent Kenyan pathologist has warned of “vaccine apartheid” in Africa amid the slow rollout of COVID-19 jabs, echoing condemnation from senior World Health Organization (WHO) officials.


Less than 2 percent of Africa’s population of 1.3 billion has been fully vaccinated against COVID-19.

Vaccine shortages continue to plague many countries and hospitals are seeing more deaths because of COVID.

“It is only two countries in the whole of Africa that have the capacity to produce vaccines, that is South Africa and Senegal. You find countries like Kenya and Egypt, they do have the technical capacity but they never really invested in it,” said Ahmed Kalebi, independent consultant pathologist and founder of Lancet Kenya.

James Nderitu, a 58-year-old resident of the Kenyan capital Nairobi, is receiving his first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine. He believes that if everything had gone to plan, he should be on his second already.

“I would therefore like to urge the European countries that have the vaccine to assist us. Instead of vaccinating children, they should stop being selfish and help the African countries so that we can get vaccinated,” said Nderitu.

‘Priorities not right’

Matshidiso Moeti, Africa director for the WHO, recently lashed out at Western nations, accusing them of hoarding vaccines when there should be a more even distribution of jabs.

The continent saw 248,000 new confirmed cases last week, with at least 28 countries seeing a surge in infections driven by the Delta variant.

“This is a preventable tragedy if African countries can get fair access to the vaccines,” Moeti told reporters.

But Kalebi said it is not as simple as blaming Western nations for Africa’s woeful vaccination rate.

“In a country like Kenya, I think we don’t just have our priorities right. Because you find that a lot of the times money will be poured into politics, money will be poured into other things but health. We are waiting for donations,” he said.

More than 7.3 million cases, including more than 186,000 deaths, have been confirmed across the continent, and health systems are straining to provide medical oxygen and other care.

According to some health experts, if Africa continues to proceed at such a slow pace with its vaccination programme, it could prolong the pandemic.

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus recently said it was “unconscionable” that some countries are now offering booster shots “while so many people remain unprotected”.

“I think it is very difficult for us to talk about booster doses in Africa,” Moeti said last week. “We have not covered even 5 percent of the population yet with the initial vaccinations that are needed to slow down the spread of the virus and, most importantly, stop what we think might be a fourth wave which is coming.”

SOURCE: NEWS AGENCIES

……………………………………………………………


Last troops exit Afghanistan, ending America’s longest war

 WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States has completed its withdrawal from Afghanistan, ending America’s longest war and closing a chapter in military history likely to be remembered for colossal failures, unfulfilled promises and a frantic final exit that cost the lives of more than 180 Afghans and 13 U.S. service members, some barely older than the war.

Last troops exit Afghanistan, ending America’s longest war

Hours ahead of President Joe Biden’s Tuesday deadline for shutting down a final airlift, and thus ending the U.S. war, Air Force transport planes carried a remaining contingent of troops from Kabul airport late Monday. Thousands of troops had spent a harrowing two weeks protecting the airlift of tens of thousands of Afghans, Americans and others seeking to escape a country once again ruled by Taliban militants.

In announcing the completion of the evacuation and war effort. Gen. Frank McKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, said the last planes took off from Kabul airport at 3:29 p.m. Washington time, or one minute before midnight in Kabul. He said a number of American citizens, likely numbering in “the very low hundreds,” were left behind, and that he believes they will still be able to leave the country.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken put the number of Americans left behind at under 200, “likely closer to 100,” and said the State Department would keep working to get them out. He praised the military-led evacuation as heroic and historic and said the U.S. diplomatic presence would shift to Doha, Qatar.

Biden said military commanders unanimously favored ending the airlift, not extending it. He said he asked Blinken to coordinate with international partners in holding the Taliban to their promise of safe passage for Americans and others who want to leave in the days ahead.

The airport had become a U.S.-controlled island, a last stand in a 20-year war that claimed more than 2,400 American lives.

The closing hours of the evacuation were marked by extraordinary drama. American troops faced the daunting task of getting final evacuees onto planes while also getting themselves and some of their equipment out, even as they monitored repeated threats — and at least two actual attacks — by the Islamic State group’s Afghanistan affiliate. A suicide bombing on Aug. 26 killed 13 American service members and some 169 Afghans. More died in various incidents during the airport evacuation.

The final pullout fulfilled Biden’s pledge to end what he called a “forever war” that began in response to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York, Washington and rural Pennsylvania. His decision, announced in April, reflected a national weariness of the Afghanistan conflict. Now he faces criticism at home and abroad, not so much for ending the war as for his handling of a final evacuation that unfolded in chaos and raised doubts about U.S. credibility.

The U.S. war effort at times seemed to grind on with no endgame in mind, little hope for victory and minimal care by Congress for the way tens of billions of dollars were spent for two decades. The human cost piled up — tens of thousands of Americans injured in addition to the dead.

More than 1,100 troops from coalition countries and more than 100,000 Afghan forces and civilians died, according to Brown University’s Costs of War project.

In Biden’s view the war could have ended 10 years ago with the U.S. killing of Osama bin Laden, whose al-Qaida extremist network planned and executed the 9/11 plot from an Afghanistan sanctuary. Al-Qaida has been vastly diminished, preventing it thus far from again attacking the United States.

Congressional committees, whose interest in the war waned over the years, are expected to hold public hearings on what went wrong in the final months of the U.S. withdrawal. Why, for example, did the administration not begin earlier the evacuation of American citizens as well as Afghans who had helped the U.S. war effort and felt vulnerable to retribution by the Taliban?

It was not supposed to end this way. The administration’s plan, after declaring its intention to withdraw all combat troops, was to keep the U.S. Embassy in Kabul open, protected by a force of about 650 U.S. troops, including a contingent that would secure the airport along with partner countries. Washington planned to give the now-defunct Afghan government billions more to prop up its army.

Biden now faces doubts about his plan to prevent al-Qaida from regenerating in Afghanistan and of suppressing threats posed by other extremist groups such as the Islamic State group’s Afghanistan affiliate. The Taliban are enemies of the Islamic State group but retain links to a diminished al-Qaida.

The final U.S. exit included the withdrawal of its diplomats, although the State Department has left open the possibility of resuming some level of diplomacy with the Taliban depending on how they conduct themselves in establishing a government and adhering to international pleas for the protection of human rights.

The speed with which the Taliban captured Kabul on Aug. 15 caught the Biden administration by surprise. It forced the U.S. to empty its embassy and frantically accelerate an evacuation effort that featured an extraordinary airlift executed mainly by the U.S. Air Force, with American ground forces protecting the airfield. The airlift began in such chaos that a number of Afghans died on the airfield, including at least one who attempted to cling to the airframe of a C-17 transport plane as it sped down the runway.

By the evacuation’s conclusion, well over 100,000 people, mostly Afghans, had been flown to safety. The dangers of carrying out such a mission came into tragic focus last week when the suicide bomber struck outside an airport gate.

Speaking shortly after that attack, Biden stuck to his view that ending the war was the right move. He said it was past time for the United States to focus on threats emanating from elsewhere in the world.

“Ladies and gentlemen,” he said, “it was time to end a 20-year war.”

The war’s start was an echo of a promise President George W. Bush made while standing atop of the rubble in New York City three days after hijacked airliners slammed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center.

“The people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon!” he declared through a bullhorn.

Less than a month later, on Oct. 7, Bush launched the war. The Taliban’s forces were overwhelmed and Kabul fell in a matter of weeks. A U.S.-installed government led by Hamid Karzai took over and bin Laden and his al-Qaida cohort escaped across the border into Pakistan.

The initial plan was to extinguish bin Laden’s al-Qaida, which had used Afghanistan as a staging base for its attack on the United States. The grander ambition was to fight a “Global War on Terrorism” based on the belief that military force could somehow defeat Islamic extremism. Afghanistan was but the first round of that fight. Bush chose to make Iraq the next, invading in 2003 and getting mired in an even deadlier conflict that made Afghanistan a secondary priority until Barack Obama assumed the White House in 2009 and later that year decided to escalate in Afghanistan.

Obama pushed U.S. troop levels to 100,000, but the war dragged on though bin Laden was killed in Pakistan in 2011.

When Donald Trump entered the White House in 2017 he wanted to withdraw from Afghanistan but was persuaded not only to stay but to add several thousand U.S. troops and escalate attacks on the Taliban. Two years later his administration was looking for a deal with the Taliban, and in February 2020 the two sides signed an agreement that called for a complete U.S. withdrawal by May 2021. In exchange, the Taliban made a number of promises including a pledge not to attack U.S. troops.

Biden weighed advice from members of his national security team who argued for retaining the 2,500 troops who were in Afghanistan by the time he took office in January. But in mid-April he announced his decision to fully withdraw.

The Taliban pushed an offensive that by early August toppled key cities, including provincial capitals. The Afghan army largely collapsed, sometimes surrendering rather than taking a final stand, and shortly after President Ashraf Ghani fled the capital, the Taliban rolled into Kabul and assumed control on Aug. 15.

Some parts of the country modernized during the U.S. war years, and life for many Afghans, especially women and girls, improved measurably. But Afghanistan remains a tragedy, poor, unstable and with many of its people fearing a return to the brutality the country endured when the Taliban ruled from 1996 to 2001.

The U.S. failures were numerous. It degraded but never defeated the Taliban and ultimately failed to build an Afghan military that could hold off the insurgents, despite $83 billion in U.S. spending to train and equip the army.

…………………………………………………

Drought diplomacy boosts Israel-Jordan ties

 Israel and Jordan are poised for an unprecedented increase in water cooperation amid increasing climate pressures.

Drought diplomacy boosts Israel-Jordan ties


As scientific warnings of dire climate change-induced drought grow, many in Israel and Jordan cast worried eyes at the river running between them and the critical but limited resources they share.

This month, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report (PDF) showed unequivocally that the climate is changing faster than previously feared, heaping pressure on finite water supplies even as demands grow greater than ever before.

But, experts say, instead of the pressure provoking arguments, Israel and Jordan could be poised for an unprecedented boom in water cooperation amid technological advancements and climate pressures.

Warnings about looming “water wars”, including in the Middle East, were often inflated, said Duke University professor Erika Weinthal.

“Water is a resource that allows for adversaries to actually find ways to cooperate,” said Weinthal, a specialist in global environmental politics, who has worked extensively on Israel-Jordan issues.

“If you look at the data, you see more cooperation over water than conflict, and where there is conflict, it is usually verbal.”

Jordan is one of the world’s most water-deficient countries, suffering from extreme droughts, and water cooperation with Israel long pre-dates a 1994 peace deal between the two.

The issue came to prominence in 1921, when Pinhas Rutenberg, a Russian-Jewish engineer who had moved to Palestine, convinced British authorities and Hashemite royals to approve a hydropower station where the Yarmuk tributary meets the Jordan River.

It continued after Israel’s founding in 1948, through decades when the nations were officially at war.

Solar for water swap?

Water deals, like all bilateral ties, suffered in recent years under former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whom critics have accused of neglecting Jordan as he pursued deeper ties with Iran’s foes in the Gulf.

But there have been signs of progress since Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s government took office in June, with the countries agreeing to their largest-ever water transaction.

New technologies reducing costs have made seawater desalination “a profitable concern”, with investors from Israel, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates – which just normalised ties with the Jewish state – showing interest, said Gidon Bromberg, Israel director at EcoPeace Middle East.

“The people that are going to invest in more desalination very much see the opportunities for profit,” Bromberg said.

It means that Israel – one of the world’s desalination leaders – can sell more water, including natural freshwater from the Sea of Galilee, to Jordan without threatening domestic demand, he said.

And Israel has a new incentive to do so, because it now needs something from Jordan in return, according to analysts.

To meet the 2015 Paris climate accord commitments, Bennett’s government has approved a target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the energy sector by at least 85 percent. Multiple assessments show Israel does not have enough land to ramp up the necessary solar production, so it will have to buy solar power from Jordan to hit its targets.

“For the very first time, all sides will have something to sell and something to buy,” said Bromberg, whose organisation works in Israel, Jordan and the occupied Palestinian territory, which is also struggling from a worsening water crisis.

This unprecedented alignment of interests could help repair semi-fractured diplomatic relations, he argued.

“There are relatively few opportunities to try and rebuild trust,” Bromberg added. “Water and energy are one of those rare opportunities.”

Palestinian issue key

Israel and Jordan have held meetings on water cooperation since the mid-1950s, including the “Picnic Table Talks”, US and UN-mediated discussions that helped shape water agreements in the 1994 peace deal.

Weinthal described those talks as “a lifeline for when these countries were technically at war”. But she also cautioned against investing too much hope in environmental diplomacy.

“This [latest] water agreement really breathes life into rekindling relations but … unless it is couched in the broader political process of dealing with the [Israeli] occupation, it will only go so far,” she said.

The July water purchase also saw Israel increase by fourfold the permitted value of Jordanian exports to the occupied West Bank.

In announcing the historic deal, Amman’s top diplomat Ayman Safadi stressed the need to establish a Palestinian state along Israel’s pre-1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital. Those are terms that are anathema to Bennett’s government.

But water pressures are mounting.

“[Jordan] is now the second-most water insecure country in the world by some measures,” The Century Foundation, a US think-tank, wrote in December report.

“Water needs are expected to exceed resources by more than 26 percent by 2025.”

SOURCE: AFP

………………………………………………………

Six sentenced to death in Bangladesh for killing LGBTQ activists

 Court orders the death penalty for members of a banned group for the brutal murders five years ago.

Six sentenced to death in Bangladesh for killing LGBTQ activists

Dhaka, Bangladesh – A court in Bangladesh has sentenced six members of a banned group to death and acquitted two others in connection with the murder of two LGBTQ rights activists five years ago.


Xulhaz Mannan was the editor of Bangladesh’s first and only gay rights magazine, Roopban. Mahbub Rabby Tonoy was his friend and associate.

The two were hacked to death at their apartment in capital Dhaka on April 25, 2016, by the men belonging to Ansar al-Islam, a group banned by the Bangladesh government the previous year. Officials say the group is a local affiliate of the al-Qaeda group.

Police escorting the accused in the 2016 murders of Mannan and Tonoy, outside a court in Dhaka [Mahmud Hossain Opu/Al Jazeera]

Amid tight security on Tuesday, Judge Md Majibur Rahman of the special anti-terrorism tribunal pronounced the verdict in the presence of four of the eight accused in a packed courtroom in Dhaka.

Those sentenced to death include former army officer Syed Ziaul Haque Zia, who officials say is the chief of the banned group.

The other five convicts are Akram Hossain, Md Mozammel Hossain alias Saimon, Md Sheikh Abdullah, Arafat Rahman, and Asadullah.

Zia and Akram are on the run and were tried as fugitives, while two other suspects – Sabbirul Hoque Chowdhury and Zunaid Ahmed – were acquitted.

Verdict ‘to set an example’

The six, wielding guns and machetes, had forced their way into Mannan’s home in the Kalabagan area of central Dhaka and murdered him and Tonoy.

While pronouncing the verdict, Judge Rahman said the punishment will “set an example” that Bangladesh does not tolerate “militancy or terrorism in any form”.

Five of those convicted had already been sentenced to death in February for the 2015 murders of a blogger and a publisher who were hacked to death in separate incidents.

Mannan’s brother Minhaz Mannan Emon, who had filed the case against unidentified assailants after the murders, told Al Jazeera he was happy that the “law enforcers have been able to find my brother’s killers”.

“Though we are not going to get Xulhaz [Mannan] back, it’s a consolation for us that the killers have been handed the maximum punishment,” Emon said.

Defence lawyer Khairul Islam Liton told Al Jazeera they would appeal against the verdict in a higher court.

An LGBTQ Pride march in Dhaka in April 2014 [[Mahmud Hossain Opu/Al Jazeera]

Mannan, 35, was a graduate of international relations from Dhaka University. He joined the US Embassy in Dhaka in 2007 and later joined the US Agency for International Development (USAID).

In 2014, he along with Tonoy set up the magazine to spread tolerance and raise awareness about LGBTQ rights.

Tonoy, 26, was also involved with a theatre group in the capital and used to teach drama to children at an organisation called the People’s Theatre.

On the anniversary of their murders earlier this year, the US Department of State issued a statement, saying they “were murdered for their courageous work on behalf of marginalised communities in Bangladesh”.

The attack on the two activists was among a series of assassinations of secular activists, bloggers, academics and religious minorities perpetrated by the Ansar al-Islam group between 2013 and 2016.

In those three years, members of the group, who claimed affiliations with ISIL (ISIS) and al-Qaeda, killed or injured more than 50 people in Bangladesh.

Often, they attacked in broad daylight with machetes or crude homemade firearms.

‘Constant fear and ostracization’

Exiled Bangladeshi journalist and LGBTQ rights activist Tasneem Khalil told Al Jazeera that by killing Mannan and Tonoy, the violent group was “able to kill the nascent LGBT rights movement” in the country.

“Today’s verdict does not change the fact that in Bangladesh, where homophobia remains the norm, thousands of gay men live in constant fear and ostracization,” Khalil said.

“Xulhaz and Mahbub’s work for the recognition and protection of LGBT rights in Bangladesh must be continued.”

Homosexuality is illegal in Bangladesh, whose law allows life imprisonment for “unnatural intercourse”.

In December 2008, the Muslim-majority country was among 59 nations that opposed the recognition of LGBTQ rights by the United Nations.

Meenakshi Ganguly, the South Asia head of Human Rights Watch, said the killings of Mannan and Tonoy occurred amid “a spate of attacks to curb the freedom of speech and belief because it offended some”.

She said the Bangladesh government should “respond to this terrible and deadly assault to do much more to uphold free speech rights and the rights of the LGBT community”.

Ganguly, however, added that the death penalty is “inherently inhumane and cruel, and should be abolished by all countries”.

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA

Berlin university canteens cut meat from menus to curb climate change

 Canteens at Berlin’s universities will offer mainly vegan and vegetarian meals from next term as part of a push to make menus more climate-friendly.

Berlin university canteens cut meat from menus to curb climate change


German reports say meat and fish dishes will only make up about 4% of menus from the start of October.

On Mondays, there will be no meat dishes available at all, as canteens swap currywurst for salads.

The canteens are currently closed, but food can be picked up on request.

The new menus are designed to reduce the carbon footprint of universities in the German capital.

Traditional German diets are quite meat heavy, and include rich foods like beef stews, pork knuckles and schnitzels. However scientists say carbon emissions produced by the meat industry are contributing to climate change.

Farming animals is responsible for 14.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions, according to the united nations food and agricultural organization

A 2019 report  by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) described plant-based diets as a major opportunity for mitigating climate change.

Daniela Kummle of Studierendenwerk, a student support group, told German media there was widespread demand for a “more climate-friendly offer at their canteens”.

Berlin’s first vegan canteen for students opened at the city’s Technical University in 2019, highlighting a growing preference for plant-based food in Germany.

In fact the diet is so popular there, Germany topped the veganism list in an international study of dietary habits by vegans on 2020 . The results showed that 2.6 million people – about 3.2% of the population – are vegan and about 3.6 million (4.4%) are vegetarians.

Meanwhile, climate protection is becoming a bigger issue at Berlin’s universities, with many drawing up detailed plans to curb their carbon emissions.

The Humboldt University wants to become climate neutral by 2030 and has hired two climate-protection managers. The Technical University is also aiming for climate neutrality by 2045.

The universities are also refurbishing buildings to make them more energy efficient.

Hundreds of staff at both universities have also voluntarily committed to forego short-haul flights for business trips.

“We have pushed the topic of climate protection significantly forward over the past four years,” says professor Hans-Ulrich Heiss, who is responsible for sustainability policies at the Technical University.

………………………………………………………

Brazil bank robbery: Hostages describe terrifying getaway car ordeal

 Bank robbers in Brazil who used hostages as human shields by forcing them to lie on the roofs and bonnets of their getaway cars told them they would be shot in the face if they did not cling on, one of the hostages has said.

Brazil bank robbery: Hostages describe terrifying getaway car ordeal

They took at least 11 people hostage and held them for nearly two hours.

Police are searching for the bank robbers, most of whom are on the run.

Three people, one of them a suspect, were killed in the robbery in the city of Araçatuba in São Paulo state.

Threatened at gunpoint

“All I could think about is that I would die,”

The man, who asked to remain anonymous for security reasons, said a gunman carrying a rifle stopped him as he rode through the streets on his motorbike.

Cars burnt during a bank robbery are seen in Aracatuba, a city some 520 km from Sao Paulo, Brazil, on August 30, 2021
image caption The gang set a number of cars alight

Even though shots had already been ringing out through the city, the man was not aware of the danger.

“I’d heard a commotion, but I thought it was fireworks. Suddenly, a man pushed me off my motorbike and told me to stop. At first, I thought it was a police checkpoint but then I saw they were assailants,” the man told UOL.

He described the robbers as “aggressive” and determined to intimidate their captives.

“If they saw someone peeking from a window, they’d shoot in that direction to frighten everyone and show us they weren’t playing,” he said.

“They told me to get out of the car, tore off my shirt and threw my cap on the ground,” he said.

“I was put onto the bonnet of a car and told: ‘If you let go, if you try to throw yourself off, I’ll stop the car and shoot you in the face.’ I think I have never held on so tightly to anything as I did then.”

The hostage described how he managed to hold on as the car was driving over speed bumps and potholes.

The mother of another hostage said it was a miracle her son had survived.

“He was forced to get onto the bonnet of one of the cars and told to just hold on with his hands. He almost fell and died,” the mother told UOL.

She also said that the hostages had been released in a rural area and it had taken them hours to walk back.

How the robbery unfolded

A group of about 20 robbers targeted three banks in Araçatuba, a city of some 200,000 people, 575 km north-west of São Paulo.

Map of Brazil

They managed to break into two banks and damaged a third one in the early hours of Monday local time.

It is not yet clear how much money they made off with, but officials said that they had gained access through the underground vault in one of the banks.

The robbers were heavily armed and their robbery appears to have been carefully planned.

They not only cut off key access roads to the city with burning vehicles, but also attacked the local military police station and placed some 40 explosive devices at 20 different locations around the city. Police say the devices are triggered by remote sensors.

One of them exploded as a man cycled past. He was seriously injured and both his feet had to be amputated.

They also used drones to monitor police activity during and after the robbery.

Police said they had arrested two suspects so far and found seven of the vehicles abandoned in a rural area outside Araçatuba.

………………………………………………………………

Apelo por Escolas Seguras e Sustentáveis no Âmbito Climático || Call for Safe and Climate-Friendly Schools in Angola

Assunto: Apelo por Escolas Seguras e Sustentáveis no Âmbito Climático Excelentíssima Senhora Vice-Presidente da República de Angola,  Espera...