Translate

Sunday 8 November 2020

Back to school after lockdown - Angola. Campaign with Sofonie Dala. Don't miss it! Webisode 20

The disruptive effects of the COVID-19 outbreak have impacted almost all sectors of our society. Education is no exception. Anecdotal evidence paints a bleak picture for both students and schools.



This webisode attempts to shed light on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on school students.

Today we invited three guys, they will share with us their challenges during the time of coronavirus.

Francisco 

Francisco is 13 years old and studies in the 6th grade. According to him, covid19 hindered his studies and forced him to stay at home for a long time.

Today he is very happy because schools are reopening and not only for that, he also told us that his school has been distributing biosafety materials constantly.

In addition, the school has created some prevention measures against covid-19 such as constantly washing hands with water and soap, division of classes, the separation between students in classrooms, etc.

Augusto and Paulo

Augusto and Paulo are 12 years old and  they both study in the sixth grade. They told us that covid-19 paralyzed them at home, impaired their school routines, religious and other daily activities.

Thank God schools reopened and we started studying again. Although our school did not distribute any biosafety material, the leaders are doing everything to prevent us from the disease, they said.

For example, the school has adopted some prevention measures against covid-19 such as social distancing, mandatory use of masks, use of alcohol gel, hand washing etc.

We are very happy to go back to school but we are also very afraid because this pandemic has already killed thousands of people, they admitted.

Students face an increasingly uncertain environment, where financial and health shocks for example, lack of resources to complete their studies or fear of becoming seriously sick have been affecting their academic performance, educational plans, current labor market participation, and expectations about future employment.


 Don't miss this opportunity to bring girls back to school. Join us!

Share your experiences learning / teaching during the school closures & the projects or initiatives you've launched to get girls back to school post # COVID19 in your local communities.
Visit my new channel to see all the activities https://she-leads.blogspot.com/


The MultiChoice Group Graduate Trainee Programme 2020 for young South Africans

 Application Deadline: November 20th 2020 

The MultiChoice Group is a broad-based multinational media and entertainment group headquartered in South Africa, Dubai and Netherlands with principal operations in pay television, video entertainment, advertising and content security serving rapidly growing base of 13.5 million households. Eminent brands within the group include DStv, GOtv, SuperSport, M-Net, DStv Now, Showmax and Europe based content security leader Irdeto. Key areas of operations are:


Storytelling ranging from content creation, production and aggregation including the best global general entertainment, sport and eminent African content library, delivered to customers
Pay Television: direct-to-home satellite and digital terrestrial television services;
SVOD: subscription video on demand services across multiple online platforms with a focus on library and local content in developing markets, and
Advertising: providing dynamic media solutions; handling commercial airtime, on-air sponsorships, content integration, and online sales across a variety of 130+ channel brands on linear TV, VOD, social media, and digital platforms.

Requirements


Must have less than 2 years working experience post studies
South African citizen by birth/naturalization or eligible to work in South Africa
Must have obtained a minimum of 65% aggregate for completed, or more recent, academic results

Click here to apply:https://bit.ly/2IdMBUO

Apply: International Youth Alliance for Family Planning (IYAFP) Country Coordinator Program 2020/2022

 Application Deadline: April 14th 2020 

IYAFP is a youth run nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting youth to learn about and advocate for family planning, sexual and reproductive health and rights. IYAFP provide an accessible platform for youth from around the world to gain the necessary skills and expertise to advocate for themselves and their communities.




Requirements

Someone between 15 and 28 years of age. 
Passionate, driven and ambitious, with the proven ability to lead a team
With basic knowledge and interest in SRHR
A commitment to mobilizing change in their community
And a resident of the country they are applying to be coordinators for
With an excellent working proficiency in English, French and/or Spanish
Who is available to commit a minimum of 7-10 hours/week for a two year tenure
And ready to take on the responsibilities required of the role


Benefits

Hone your leadership and advocacy skills and expand your experience in the field of SRHR through educational and training opportunities
The opportunity to rally youth in your country about a cause you care about and lead a national team
Shape and strengthen IYAFP’s global network 
Initiate and access small project grants to develop your country specific initiatives
Connect digitally to the full IYAFP Network of members and alumni via a digital platform


Click here to apply: https://tinyurl.com/uff6rfz

USEmbassy EducationUSA Opportunity Funds Program (OFP) 2020/2021 for young Nigerians (Funded to study in USA)

 Application Deadline: May 31st 2020




There are many determined and talented, low-income students in Nigeria who only require financial resources and access to information to better their educational future. For the 11th year, the United States Embassy, Nigeria seeks to identify academically qualified and highly motivated, low-income students in Nigeria to join the EducationUSA Opportunity Funds Program (OFP).


OFP’s mission is to assist talented and determined, low-income students who are good candidates for financial assistance from U.S. colleges and universities but lack the financial resources to cover the up-front cost of obtaining admission.


OFP works closely with students through regularly scheduled meetings and seminars to assist them throughout the application process to secure admission and scholarships to attend colleges and universities in the United States. OFP finances the cost of the application process, including registration fees for required standardized examinations and provides free membership to the U.S. EducationUSA Advising Center for its participants. OFP expects a sincere commitment from the students to give their energy and time to the program so that they may achieve their dreams of study in the United States.


Applicants are welcome from all the states in Nigeria. However, students must be able to reach our offices in Abuja or Lagos on a monthly basis during the program for full participation. Participants will work with our EducationUSA Advisors from June 2020 – August 2021 to try to secure places and financial assistance to begin study in the U.S. in August 2021.


SELECTION CRITERIA


The selection of finalists for OFP is highly competitive, given limited funding. We look for applicants with:

Strong academic record/ transcript
Robust participation in extracurricular activities
Involvement in leadership roles
Excellent community service participation
Financial Need
NOTE: Undergraduate Applicants– If WAEC results are not available; the student must be currently in SS3. If WAEC results are available, they must be from May/June WAEC.

Students who have already started a University education are NOT eligible to apply.


Requirements


Complete Application Form
Academic Results:
Undergraduate Applicants– Attach a copy of your WAEC “O” Level results (from WAEC website). Include Cambridge A’Level or IGSCE results if applicable or available.
Graduate Applicants– Attach a copy of your Final year results and degree results (if available) First Class only (STEM majors preferred).


Click here to apply:  https://tinyurl.com/vv2noey

SMC PLANS TO PRODUCE 104 MILLION CARATS OF DIAMONDS BY 2037

 Dundo - The Catoca Mining Society (SMC), Angola's fourth largest diamond company and the fourth in the world to produce in the open air, plans to produce 104 million carats of diamonds by 2037, in an approved reserve of 138 million tons of ore.

Analysing the current scenario for the diamond sub-sector amid the Covid-19, the general director of SMC, Benedito Manuel, said that if the prospects were met Catoca could net US$9.3 billion, if the market price was around US$90 per carat.

At that price, the company located in Saurimo, Lunda Sul province, will contribute in the State General Budget until 2037 with US$585 million in industrial tax and US$1billion in tax revenues, in the current scenario.

In percentage terms, in relation to tax revenues, for the current scenario where 11.4% is forecast, the figures point to a 3% reduction compared to 2017 (15.6%), 2018 (15.1%) and 2019 (14.5%).

He justified that the tax margins are expected to be reduced in this period (2020-2037) in view of the deepening of the mine and the use of drilling and detonation work for the removal of waste rock and extraction of the ore.

ANGOLANS FREE AND SOVEREIGN

 The Republic of Angola will be marking, on the coming 11 November, 45 years since it attained its national independence.   

Angola@45: 60 Happy Independence Day Celebration messages, wishes, Quotes  and Pictures you can send to your families, Friends and Loved Ones. – News  Trust Nigeria

This is one of the country’s major historical landmarks that brought the Portugal colonial regime to an end, after several decades in pursuit of freedom, sovereignty and affirmation of its people.

The attainment of independence, proclaimed by the then MPLA president, António Agostinho Neto, set the beginning of a tough political, diplomatic, social and economic trajectory.

This is one of the major achievements scored by Angolans as a sovereign people, who managed to overcome the various setbacks in the course of their history, with stress to a 27-year lasting violent and bloody war.

The National independence paved the way for a free country, which, 45 years now, is still in search of the best avenues to fight poverty and social imbalances, and reach sustainable development.

These were, no doubt, years of intense sacrifice, marked by several stages of progresses and setbacks, that Angop seeks to present, in brief, in this journalistic dossier on 11 November.

This special work carries analysis of the main moments of the country’s history, in political, economic, social, diplomatic and legislative terms, with detailed articles on what has marked Angola over its 45 years of sovereignty.

Please follow, down here, exclusive interviews on political, diplomatic and civil society players who speak their mind about what they think of the 45 years and how they envisaged Angola.

ANGOLA: 45 YEARS OF ECONOMIC CHALLENGES

The economic matters continues to be one of the great challenges of the Angolan authorities in the analysis of the 45 years of National Independence, achieved on 11 November 1975.  

Image

Theorists from various latitudes consider that a country is only truly free when, in addition to political independence, also achieves economic independence.

Angola's post-independence history is characterised by advances and setbacks, as the country's development plan was affected by a 27-year war, which killed, mutilated and displaced thousands of people, impoverished most Angolans, lacerated human fabric and destroyed important infrastructure.

When, on 11 November 1975, the then president of the MPLA, António Agostinho Neto, proclaimed the independence of Angola from the former colonial power (Portugal) and assumed the leadership of the State, Angolans created enormous expectations in the construction of a country that would provide them with social welfare, development and progress.But these expectations were frustrated by the fratricidal war, which only ended definitely in 2002. 

During this period, many cadres and valuable human resources, who could contribute to the economic development of the young nation, left the country, causing a huge deficit in this regard.

The Government had to deal with this constraint, combining the country's economic management with war efforts, whose expenses consumed a large part of the country's resources that could otherwise be used to build infrastructure.

 Macroeconomic reforms

 After independence and the adoption of an economic model centred on the State, in 1976 the Government created the Banco Nacional de Angola and Banco Popular de Angola, which inherited the assets and liabilities of Banco de Angola and Banco Comercial de Angola, then just nationalised.

 In this way, the premises for the implementation of macroeconomic reforms were created. The first of which was the approval, on 11 November 1976, of the Law on National Currency, which made it possible, in 1977, for the replacement of the colonial Escudo with the Kwanza (AKZ), an important measure in terms of the affirmation of the  national sovereignty.

 In 1981, 1984 and 1986, in order to secure greater currency security and combat counterfeits of the money then introduced in the market, small changes were made to the notes, with José Eduardo dos Santos as President of the Republic, after replacing, in 1979, Agostinho Neto, who died in September that same year.

 Also within the scope of the economic model in force at the time, in 1978 the National Insurance and Reinsurance Company of Angola (ENSA) was created, which, with the liquidation, in 1981, of the insurance companies and other mutual institutions then existing, took over their assets and liabilities, grabbing the monopoly in this sector at national level.

 In the new banking system, the National Bank of Angola started to perform the functions of a central bank, commercial, issuer and treasury box, being a body of the Central Administration of the State, created by law, in May 1983, while the Banco Popular de Angola was just a fund for raising private savings.

 Another relevant reform was the creation, in 1987, of the Economic and Financial Reform Programme (SEF), which aimed to adopt the market economy model, greater openness to the private initiative and other actions that favoured the mobilisation of financial resources, investment (domestic and foreign) and macro-economic stabilisation.

 At the time, the Angolan economy was plagued by a serious crisis caused by the drop in the price of an oil barrel from USD  30 to USD 10, which was unsustainable given the enormous war effort. With the launch of SEF, the Government was looking for an alternative to the then socialist system of centralised economy, according to several economists.

 “There was a clear orientation towards the market economy, the banking system, the payment system and the financing of the economy. Basically that. The IMF, with its programmes, created a certain economic duality in Angola”, according to economist José Cerqueira, one of the members of the team that worked on the designing of the SEF.

 

José Cerqueira said, in an interview with Jornal de Angola, that this duality consisted of calculating the fiscal price of oil, with, for example, up to USD 50 a barrel, all resources were managed under the supervision of the International Monetary Fund, thereafter, as a special programmes for the President of the Republic.

 It was also in that period that the National Private Investment Agency (ANIP) was created, being extinguished in 2015 and replaced with the current Private Investment and Export Agency of Angola (AIPEX), whose mission is to promote exports and attract private investment.

 Transition and market economy

 The New York Agreements, signed in 1988 between the Government and UNITA and which dictated the withdrawal of South African and Cuban troops from the Angola soil, as well as the independence of Namibia and eradication of the apartheid regime in South Africa, enabled the achievement of peace and stability in Angola.

 As a result of this understanding,  the Angolan Government started negotiations with international financial institutions and bodies, being, for example, in this context that it joined, in 1989, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank (BM) and the International Bank of Reconstruction and Development (IBRD).

 Economic reforms continued and, in 1990, again within the scope of the fiscal policy, the national currency, the Kwanza, was replaced by the New Kwanza (AON) and, in 1991, the Government devaluated the New Kwanza.

 After the signing of the Bicesse Agreements, in May 1991, between the Government and then rebel UNITA, which temporarily put an end to the civil war, the bases were laid for the emergence of multiparty system and the resulting  liberalisation of the country's economy, which came into effect after the 1992 General Elections.

 For example, new public banks were set up and the first foreign banking institutions in the country were authorised, such as Totta & Açores (BTA), Foreign Promotion (BFE), Português do Atlântico (BPA), among others, which essentially operated in foreign exchange transactions in the secondary market and in medium and long term investment financing.

 The definite end of the war, in April 2002, made it possible to revive the economy, with the country being considered one of those with fastest growth in the period until 2014, translated into a reduction in the incidence of poverty from 68 percent in 2001 to 36, six percent, in 2009, according to data from the National Statistics Institute (2010).

 In 2014, the Stock Exchange and Derivatives of Angola (BODIVA), responsible for ensuring transparency, efficiency and security of transactions in regulated securities markets, to stimulate the participation of small investors and competition between all operators, was created.

 This period was also characterised by the reconstruction of the infrastructure destroyed during the armed conflict (mainly hospitals, schools, roads, bridges, factories, railways and airports) and construction of others.

 However, despite the significant progress made in macroeconomic stabilisation and structural reforms, Angola continued to suffer the effects of falling oil prices and production levels, a sector that contributes a third of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and more than 90 percent of the country's exports.

 "The transformation of a State-led oil economy to a growth model led by the private sector is a complex and long-term process and the oil sector will continue to play an important role during this transition period", warns the BM, in a study updated in July this year.

 The reforms also included the approval of the Law on Public Finance Sustainability, which introduces instruments with a multi-year horizon and defines the main mechanisms for monitoring its performance.

 In the tax domain, highlight for the introduction of the Value Added Tax (VAT), in 2019, whose collection volume went from AKZ 75 billion per quarter to around AKZ 145 billion, for the same time span.

 With regard to regional integration, significant steps have been taken to enhance the participation of the Angolan economy in regional and international markets.

 At the SADC level, discussions for the implementation of a Free Trade Area is expected, whose protocol Angola has already ratified.

 The country has also started the process of preparing the Tariff Offer for the African Continental Free Trade Area, the protocol of which has already been ratified as well.

 Credibility, diversification and sustained investment

 In another respect, in 2019, the Integrated Municipal Intervention Programme (PIIM) was launched, being implemented in the country’s 164 municipalities, with priority to the sectors of power and water, health, education, basic sanitation and road construction.

 The programme is funded with the amount to the tune, in Kwanzas, of two billion dollars from the Angola Sovereign Wealth Fund (FSDEA).

 Of the 749 projects planned, 1,200 are underway, 12 have already been completed and 537 are in preparation to start, with the aim of significantly improving the living of the population.

 In addition, the Government established the Action Plan for the Promotion of Employability (PAPE) and the Reinforcement of the Default Regularisation Process, involving the 83 programmes that envisage the implementation of the National Development Plan (PDN) for the 2018-2022 period and which continues annually as a priority item under the State Budget (OGE).

 Among the Executive's measures, the laws on Preventing and Combating Money Laundering and on Privatisations, the creation of the Balcão Único for Investors, to improve the business environment, in addition to the establishment of a social protection register, stand out, to protect the most vulnerable from the effects of the reforms.

 The BM predicts, however, a decline in growth in the non-oil sector, due to the indirect effects of falling oil prices, reduced imports of capital goods, more restrictive financing conditions, exchange rate depreciation and limitations in the movement of people and goods.

 “The Covid-19 pandemic and the global economic turmoil caused by it are jeopardizing the achievements of Angola’s macro-economic stabilisation and the country's transition to a more sustainable and inclusive growth model”, concludes the BM study.

 Projections from international institutions, such as the IMF, World Bank, AfDB and others of financial risk assessment, released in 2019, estimate that Angola could, four years after an unbearable recession, experience again a rise in its growth indicator between one  and three percent.

 The almost exclusive dependence on oil exports means that Angola, the 2nd largest producer of this product in sub-Saharan Africa, after Nigeria, continues to suffer from the price drop in international markets since the crisis began in 2014, when the crude oil barrel was at USD 117.

 The crisis has had such a negative impact that it caused the postponement of the implementation of several important economic projects, with a direct influence on the life of the population, faced with unemployment, insufficient health, educational and housing structures, in addition to drastically reducing their purchasing power.

 Added to this is the fact that the revenues resulting from the oil boom were embezzled by a group of individuals who, taking advantage of their privileged condition in the state apparatus, emptied the State’s coffers and took over the treasury, leaving the country and the people in enormous difficulties.

 In this regard, the Government's investment is focused on diversifying the country's economy, with a strong stress on promoting agriculture and improving the business environment, seeking to place Angola's position in the global “doing business” ranking among the best in the coming years, and combating corruption and impunity.

 In the field of agriculture, measures have been taken to increase national production, make the private business sector stronger and more competitive, reduce imports of essential consumer goods and contribute to exports from the non-oil sector of the economy.

 In July 2018, the Government approved the Production Support, Export Diversification and Import Replacement Programme (PRODESI), with a view to the goals contained in the National Development Programme (PDN).

 Already in progress and aimed at accelerating the diversification of national production and generation of wealth, in a group of productions with a greater potential to generate export value and import substitution, the programme focuses on the food and agro-industry sectors.

 Other areas are mineral resources, oil and natural gas, forestry and textiles, clothing and footwear, construction and public works, information and telecommunication technologies, health, education, training and scientific research, tourism and leisure.

 As part of the promotion of national production, until September this year, 589 financing requests were approved, under the initiatives of the Credit Support Programme (PAC) to support PRODESI's goals, according to President João Lourenço, in his recent message on the State of the Nation.

 Highlight for the financing of more than 300 cooperatives of family farmers and ranchers, as well as artisanal marine, continental and aquaculture cooperatives. The total amount disbursed reaches about Akz 144 billion.

 New laws on Private Investment and Competition were also passed, the latter being the first in Angola, which dictated the creation of the Competition Authority, tasked with preventing situations of abuse of a dominant position and promoting and defending a sound market competition.

 In order to reduce the State's participation in the economy, as a direct producer of goods and services, and to promote favorable conditions for private initiative, foreign investment and the acquisition of know-how, the Government launched the privatization of several companies in which the State is the current owner or shareholder.

 According to the holder of the Executive Branch, “of the 195 assets to be taken into account, until 2022, some 40 are in the public tender phase and 14 have already been privatized, resulting in a holding for the National Treasury of more than 31 billion Kwanzas”.

 "With the increase in national production, we will have more jobs, increase the income of the population and, therefore, improving the quality of life of Angolans, thus fighting poverty", emphasised the President of the Republic, in his recent message on the State of the Nation.

 Regarding corruption, the country approved the Law on Coercive Repatriation of Capitals and Extended Loss of Assets, which establishes that holders of patrimonial assets obtained with the resources from the treasury return the illegally acquired resources to the State.

 Before that, another law had been in force for a period of 180 days that allowed the voluntary return of assets illegally obtained.

 President João Lourenço revealed that the State was defrauded of at least USD 24 billion, an amount that exceeds the value of Angola's debt to its main creditor, China.

 According to João Lourenço, the State has recovered USD 4,9 billion, of which USD 2,7 billion cash and USD 2,1 billion worth of real estate, factories, port terminals, office and housing buildings, radio and television stations, graphic plants, commercial outlets and others.

 Still with regard to fighting corruption, impunity and money laundering, several criminal and civil proceedings are underway across the country, while others have already been finalised.

 In addition to this, highlight for the approval, in November 2019, of the Law on Preventing and Combating Money Laundering, Financing of Terrorism and the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, replacing that on Combating Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism, approved in 2010.

 The new law leaves politically exposed persons (PEP) subject to increased due diligence and is a recommendation of the International Financial Action Group (FATF), with the intention of inhibiting the payment of financial entities domiciled in offshores, connected with criminal organisations.

 It is under the sign of the fight against corruption, the main banner of the electoral campaign of the party winning the August 2017 elections, the MPLA, and assumed by its leader and President of the Republic, João Lourenço, that country marks the 45th anniversary of its national independence.

 It is a hard and complex task, with strong opposition from those who unduly and illegally seized public funds, but which has the support of the majority of Angolans, who want the moralisation of the society and the fair distribution of the country's wealth.

 Basically, Angola celebrates 45 years of independence in a context in which the Government is endeavouring to revitalise the country's economy, deeply affected by cyclical economic and financial crises, resulting from the sharp fall in the price of oil, its main source of income, seconded by diamonds, and now by the Covid-19 pandemic.

 In order to revive the economy, the Angolan Executive, now led by President João Lourenço, has adopted, over the years, several macro-economic measures, with  a view to the economic diversification, with an emphasis on the investment in the sectors of agriculture, mining, fisheries and manufacturing industry

US removes group condemned by China from ‘terror’ list

 The United States has removed from its list of “terrorist” groups a shadowy faction regularly blamed by China to justify its harsh crackdown in the Muslim-majority Xinjiang region.

US removes group condemned by China from ‘terror’ list

In a notice in the Federal Register, which publishes new US laws and rules, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said he was revoking the designation of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) as a “terrorist organisation”.

ETIM was removed from the list because, for more than a decade, there has been no credible evidence that ETIM continues to exist,” a State Department spokesperson said.

The administration of George W Bush in 2004 added ETIM, also sometimes called the Turkestan Islamic Party, to a blacklist as it found common cause with China in the so-called US-led “war on terror”.

Beijing has regularly blamed ETIM for attacks as it justifies its measures in Xinjiang, where rights groups say one million or more Uighurs or other Turkic-speaking, mostly Muslim people are held in camps.

But analysts say China has produced little evidence that ETIM is an organised group, or that it is to blame for attacks in Xinjiang, which separatists call East Turkestan.

The Washington-based Uyghur Human Rights Project called the State Department’s decision “long overdue” and a “definitive rejection of China’s claims”.

“The harmful effects of China’s exploitation of the imagined ‘ETIM’ threat are real – 20 years of state terror directed at Uighurs,” said the group’s executive director, Omer Kanat.

But China’s foreign ministry spokesman on Friday expressed China’s “strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to the US decision”, urging the US to “stop backpedalling on international counterterrorism cooperation”.

China has struggled for decades to control Xinjiang, where the native Uighurs have long resented Beijing’s heavy-handed rule. With the September 11, 2001, attacks on the US, officials began using the spectre of “terrorism” to justify harsher religious restrictions, saying young Uighurs were susceptible to violent “extremism”.

While analysts have doubted the role of ETIM, China has suffered a series of attacks that authorities blamed on Uighur separatists.

In 2014, assailants stabbed to death 31 passengers at a railway station in the southwestern city of Kunming.

In 2009, hundreds died in Xinjiang’s capital Urumqi in riots that largely targeted China’s majority Han.

Activists say China is trying to forcibly integrate Uighurs by indoctrinating them with Communist ideology and making them renounce Islamic customs.

Pompeo has previously called the mass detention “the stain of the century” and US senators across party lines are seeking to declare China’s treatment of the Uighurs as genocide.

ETIM was listed on the US Terrorism Exclusion List, which affects the entry of people into the country, but was never hit with the tougher designation of Foreign Terrorist Organisation.

Joe Biden Wins Historic 2020 Presidential Election, Vanquishing Donald Trump

 Joe Biden is projected to become the next president of the United States after an election that was historic, messy, chaotic and uncertain.

Biden poised for U.S. election win as his lead over Trump grows

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) will be with him as vice president, the first woman, Black person and Asian American to ever hold the position.

The decisive call came in Pennsylvania, which gave Biden the necessary electoral votes to clinch the presidency. Biden could further pad his Electoral College victory in Arizona and Nevada, where he leads, and Georgia, which is neck and neck. (Trump has a more comfortable lead in North Carolina.) Biden already flipped two other states that Trump won in 2016: Michigan and Wisconsin, reclaiming Democrats’ Rust Belt “blue wall.”

The former vice president also decisively won the popular vote, receiving the most votes in American history and besting Trump by more than 4 million.

In a statement, Biden said he is “honored and humbled by the trust the American people have placed” in him and Harris. “In the face of unprecedented obstacles, a record number of Americans voted. Proving once again, that democracy beats deep in the heart of America,” he continued, saying, “It’s time for America to unite. And to heal.”

In a speech on Friday, Biden pointed to his large vote lead and claimed a broad “mandate for action” on the coronavirus, the economy, climate change and systemic racism.

For months, Trump had been laying the groundwork to reject the election results if they didn’t go his way. He not only tried to undermine mail-in voting but claimed that if the winner wasn’t declared on election night, the results would be suspect ― even though some state rules allow mail-in ballots to be received after Election Day.

And sure enough, Trump did exactly as he said he would.

“Frankly, we did win this election,” Trump said Wednesday shortly after 2 a.m. Eastern, while millions of ballots had yet to be counted, a number of key swing states were still in limbo and no news organization had yet to project a winner.

He also tweeted that Democrats were trying to “STEAL the Election” and wrote, “Votes cannot be cast after the Polls are closed!” (No votes were cast after the polls closed.)

On Thursday, he held a lie-filled news conference in which he baselessly claimed that there was vote fraud, without providing any evidence.

Defeating an incumbent president is difficult and rare. It hasn’t happened in nearly 30 years. It’s only the fourth time it’s happened in the past 100 years. Biden did it during a pandemic against a president with a devoted following who is willing to lie and cheat.

Biden also amassed more than 70 million votes, the most a presidential candidate has ever received in a U.S. election.

Yet the Electoral College meant that the nation was obsessing over the latest batches of votes in places like Arizona and Georgia to see who would be declared the winner ― even as Biden was leading Trump by about 4 million votes nationwide. 

Democrats expected the election to be a referendum on Trump’s handling of the coronavirus. Biden and the party kept their message squarely on the virus and health care, while Trump tried to divert attention to crime, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), China and Biden’s son Hunter.

There’s no doubt that the coronavirus hurt the reelection prospects of the president, who wanted to run on the health of the economy under his watch. Without the pandemic, arguably, Trump may have won.

Early exit polls show that more voters said the pandemic was the most important issue facing the country. Those voters went for Biden, while people who cited the economy and jobs went for Trump.

Defeating Trump was an incredible achievement for Democrats and will have significant consequences.

Trump used his presidential powers to separate migrant children from their parents, enrich his family and encourage far-right conspiracy theorists. He mocked American troops who died in war, made racist comments and tried to use the Justice Department as his own personal enforcement agency to go after his political enemies. He was also only the third president in U.S. history to be impeached by the House.

His toxic brand of racism, sexism and fear-based politics propelled him into the White House in 2016. But it wasn’t enough this time. He was no longer an outsider who could come into Washington and shake up a tired old establishment.

Instead, the nation chose Biden, a man who embodies the political establishment. He spent 36 years as a senator from Delaware and eight years as vice president. He will be 78 when he is inaugurated in January, the oldest president in history.

Biden ran on character. He showed qualities that Trump didn’t seem to possess: kindness, empathy, a history of overcoming adversity, experience, caution and an aversion to drama.

And many voters ― many of whom had to vote by mail because they’re still waiting out the raging coronavirus pandemic ― decided that was exactly the person they were ready for this time. Turnout was massive, the highest in 200 years.

At first, Trump tried to pretend the coronavirus wasn’t a problem. He said it wasn’t all that worse than the common flu and predicted it would be gone by April. At the Republican National Convention, Trump and his allies portrayed the crisis as largely over, defeated by the valiant president.

Even after Trump himself was hit with a positive coronavirus diagnosis ― a perhaps inevitable conclusion to his refusal to wear masks and his insistence on holding large in-person gatherings ― he and his administration continued on course, using the experience to claim that the illness wasn’t all that bad.

“Don’t be afraid of Covid. Don’t let it dominate your life,” Trump tweeted on Oct. 5, after more than 200,000 Americans had died from it.

Biden took a far different approach. He kept his focus squarely on the coronavirus pandemic. He wore masks, cautioned the public to listen to scientists and stopped large in-person rallies and events. His campaign even stopped door-knocking for most of the campaign, restarting it only at the very end.

And he showed empathy for people who had struggled with the virus.

Biden is a politician who wears his heart on his sleeve. He’s had little choice. A month after being elected to the Senate for the first time in 1972, he lost his wife and daughter in a car crash. In 2015, his son Beau ― the attorney general of Delaware ― died from brain cancer.

Those struggles helped people relate to him. And he responded in kind to people who shared their stories of loss with him.

The Democratic Party aggressively encouraged voters to cast ballots by mail to avoid potentially long, dangerous lines during the pandemic. Trump, meanwhile, engaged in fearmongering about voting by mail, insisting the election results wouldn’t be legitimate and falsely claiming the method is ripe for fraud and abuse.

That rhetoric was a problem, and the Republican Party worked to clean up his mess by sending out mailers and robocalls insisting to people that voting by mail was safe ― even doctoring Trump’s own tweets to make it seem like the president agreed.

Still, it was not the decisive blow that Democrats hoped for. The election revealed larger trends and problems that have nothing to do with Biden that the party will be dealing with for years.

“Yes, Trump is horrible, but it’s never been all about about Trump,” said a Democratic Senate strategist. “And now because of events, it’s just that much more obvious. There’s the Supreme Court and not having the Senate and everything they’ve done to rig democracy.”

“We got what we needed, which is to end the Trump presidency,” a House Democratic lawmaker told HuffPost. “We didn’t get what we wanted.”

Even though Biden won, the polls, once again, underestimated support and turnout for Trump. The president made inroads with Latinos, and he actually performed better this year than he did in 2016 in counties with high coronavirus rates. Trump also won the majority of votes in states with the highest death rates from the disease, including Florida and Texas, although many of those areas are more conservative and more likely to shun the mask-wearing and social distancing that Trump has also mocked.

Significantly, Biden’s success didn’t translate down the ballot. Democratic hopes of picking up a robust majority in the Senate melted away, and Democrats appear set to lose ground in the House. A surge of grassroots donations in Senate races like South Carolina, Kentucky and Texas weren’t enough to overcome Republican dominance in those states. And Republicans who were considered sitting ducks for Democratic wins ― like Susan Collins in Maine ― won reelection.

“It was a bad night,” Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said on MSNBC Wednesday, adding that Democrats “need to sharpen our message.”

And the larger picture looks tough for Democrats. The election results underscored that the Senate grants disproportionate power to rural Americans ― who are far more likely to be old, white and conservative than other voters — and basically ensures that the Democratic Party won’t pursue the demands of its left flank.

Democrats also failed to cut into GOP control of state legislatures ahead of redistricting next year.

The challenges facing Biden are enormous. He has a steadily growing pandemic and an economy suffering from the fallout, an emboldened racial justice movement that wants to see reform, climate change, a hollowed-out civil service and a fractured country. His policies will no doubt be challenged in the courts, where they will ultimately come up against a U.S. Supreme Court with a 6-3 conservative majority.

And he will have to get as much as done as he can without the robust Senate majority for which he had no doubt hoped. Control of the chamber is still up in the air. If it stays in Republican hands, Biden will be the first president since George H.W. Bush who will take office without his party controlling Congress.

“If Democrats don’t win the Senate, governing in the Biden era will make the post-Tea Party years of the Obama Administration seem idyllic in comparison,” a senior Senate Democratic aide predicted.

Trump will not be disappearing. His campaign has filed last-ditch lawsuits challenging the results in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania.

And he’s still the dominant force in the Republican Party with no obvious successor, aside from his own son.

For now, however, he is what he has always feared the most: a loser.

International Day of Clean Energy 2024 | 26 January 2024

 Every dollar of investment in renewables creates three times more jobs than in the fossil fuel industry.  Greetings friends. I am Sofonie D...